Friday, August 29, 2014

Judicial Watch: Feds’ Bulletin Describes Threat of Imminent Terrorist Attack on Southern Border

And they're worried about us? Islamic terrorist groups are operating in the Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez and planning to attack the United States with car bombs or other vehicle born improvised explosive devices (VBIED). High-level federal law enforcement, intelligence and other sources have confirmed to Judicial Watch that a warning bulletin for an imminent terrorist attack on the border has been issued. Agents across a number of Homeland Security, Justice and Defense agencies have all been placed on alert and instructed to aggressively work all possible leads and sources concerning this imminent terrorist threat.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Maybe it is time to seal the border.

Anonymous said...

The treadmill speeds up ...

III

Anonymous said...

Sounds like one of those crises Rahm Emanuel is so fond of. Reckon Dear Leader would respond to a major terrorist attack with a declaration of a state of emergency and imposition of martial law? Be a dandy excuse to "postpone" the November elections "for the duration" of the "emergency" and start activating some of those executive orders - plus issuing a ton more.

You reckon Dear Leader would even consider ordering a Katrina-style disarming of the population? Purely for our own safety, of course.

Best make sure your emergency food/water stores are up to date. Especially down here in south Texas within the "no-4th-Amendment" zone.

What do you think, Dutchman? Could an attack (or several attacks) provide the excuse they're looking for to clamp down hard? Sounds like a great way to trigger the start of an active insurgency. Doesn't it? Or is my native pessimism cum paranoia just on hyperdrive?

Anonymous said...

BadCyborg, I agree 100% with your assessment! That's exactly what I believe this is all about! Our government is Trying to pre-condition the American public to the Evilness of 'ISIS' beforehand, so when an attack happens here and the government Tries to Declare Martial law and Tries to Confiscate our Firearms, that the American people ( In theory at least ) will not Fight against Obama and Companies Trying to Declare Martial Law ( Again,in theory at least ), believing it is a "Real Attack" by a foreign Terrorist Entity!

Anonymous said...

If you actually believe this I have a bridge to sell you...

Anonymous said...

Anon at 2:44 & 2:57,
I do not think that ISIS is any sort of false flag. For one thing, NOBODY ON EARTH is "controlling" those bloody ISIS butchers. Certainly not our government. The rest of the world thinks even LESS of Obama (if that is possible) than the kind of folks who follow the Dutchman here. There is no need to posit collusion of any sort between ISIS and the current administration. Besides, control/collusion would imply a level of political adroitness that these bozos have yet to demonstrate.

That does not, however, preclude the administration being willing to take advantage of ISIS' natural proclivities to generate an exploitable crisis. By keeping the border essentially wide open, the administration is generating the conditions to help a major terrorist event to occur. But that requires no collusion.

Moe Death said...

We guess it makes sense that the government is going to declare "Marital Law," seeing as how they're screwing us all anyway...

Bill and Domino
III

Anonymous said...

The situation is entirely engineered. For example:

ISIS was formed out of the militants who were armed, supported and trained by the United States. Why do I say this? Well we helped the rebels destroy the Gadaffi government. We launched air strikes and supplied boots ont ehground in the form of intelligence assest adn advisors. What the militants gained in one example is 12,000 stinger surface to air shoulder fired missiles. So why did we uproot a head of state which had changed sides and were helping us. Gadaffi was puting his country on a gold standard and was encouraging other Arab nations to abandon the Oil Dollar.

Next we go to Syria. Why are we destabilizing a leader who is not our concern to directly support with arms supplies and air strikes the attempted overthrow of the elected leader of Syria. Now the CR and this administration are making overt plans to violate Syrias borders and strike ISIS. Their plausible pretext is that Syria cannot secure its own territory. NFS! We just helped ISIS to grab and hold a prat of Syria.

Now we come to Benghazi. Of course everyone with half a brain knows the this was an arms deal gone bad. When it was realized the administrationlets those people die in Benghazi hoping it would just all go away and the evidence get cover up by the conflict it helped to evolve. Then they lied to everyone claiming it was some damned video that caused a protest. They have even been proved to be lying and knew about the attack all along. This proves two things. 1.) They are intent upon moving forward with generating a global conflict, 2.) They will kill or allowed to be killed anyone, including a US Ambassador to get what they want and lie about it.

Now we have ISIS threatening us and the poorous US Southern Border is ample opportunity to allow anyone to simply walk across. This has been ongoing and it has even been proven that some of the 9/11 terrorist came across the border. So instead of closing the border down this administration has done everything possible except to give armed escort to those crossing. This type of enabling does not come from an inept blundering series of random events. It takes very careful planning to orchestrate this type of operation, all inplain sight.

Well lets not forget the Ukraine. Why did we stick our nose into this mess.... Because it involved Eurpoe's financil success as the European Union, again funded and louded by the banking cartels.

So we have a pefect storm of events and this Ass in Chief can only go golfing and attend fund rasiers???? All this smoke and mirrors picture belies the type of organization and coordination it takes to pull off a major coup against the American People.

If any of you folks out there have any doubt about the veracity of this claim, either you are not up on current events are merely sheep in denial.

As for controlling ISIS.... you don't have to control them all you have to do is manipulate them. Give them opportunities and they wil take them. Remember that one facet of the the Marxist Ideology is to appeal to self interest. ISIS already has it sights on us, all this Terrorist in Chief has to do is provide them with the opportunity.

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Ephesians 6:12

"High Places" is actually Political Office that Samuel warned the people about when the wanted a king instead of God to rule them... and so it is.

William Flatt said...

BadCyborg has this one nailed. The criminal regime running this country is aiding and abetting terrorists, both directly and indirectly... and when the feces hits the oscillating air propulsion device, I'll bet you my retirement check that Obozo, Holder & Co. will say the militias did it.

Everything now is just dress rehearsal for the 2nd American Revolution.

Paul X said...

This "threat" is probably a creation of the FBI, just like most of the previous ones. Unless it is CIA, who created ISIL. It certainly serves to justify their existence, and that is always a help (end sarcasm).

Why are people worrying about terrorists in Juarez? How about the terrorists in Washington DC?

Let's not be led down the garden path yet again...

DAN III said...

The words of a fedgov stooge means nothing to me. While soetoro-obama has invited the invasion we're now to believe some bad guys are forthcoming thru rhe same border the invited invaders waltzed ? False flag here we come.

BTW....eff obama.

T. Paine said...

A terrorist attack at the border inside CONUS would be all the reason obonobo would need to cascade a flood of new exec orders, gun bans, ammo bans and on and on and the attack would be blamed on the readily available 'assault weapons' in the US. After all, it would HAVE to be done to 'save the chirrens'.